Honestly, who the heck lets their seven year old girl child dress like a slut and dance like that in public? And then posts it on youtube so that anyone and everyone can copy it on their hard drive? Last time I checked, that song "Single Ladies" has a sexual undertone to it. Burlesque wear and pre PREpubescent girls should not be used in the same sentence. And the dancing, holy toledo the dancing. Yes, the girls do have talent and can do moves that would be hard for a lot of older girls taking professional dance lessons. But that does not excuse the fact that they're shaking things that they don't even have and dancing suggestively. I would like to know what was going on through the parents heads when they saw their girls practicing to that song and then saw the outfits.
The outfits kill it, I mean if they were wearing loose jeans and fitted tops the dance would look halfway normal. And I say halfway because there are a few parts of the dance that are suggestive no matter what way you look at it. But other parts of the dance are okay and would look much better on a child who was wearing a bit more clothing.
A pedophile's wet dream
Posted by sourpatchbaby | 5/13/2010 | ...?, Things that make you go huh? | 1 comments »
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
oh my god!! i just saw this posted on a mommy site asking our opinion. i was so sick. i posted a comment on the youtube link!
** i got about 30 seconds into it and didnt need to see any more.
very inappropriate. not even beyonce wore an outfit that provocative in the video.
why would you want small girls be making sexual gestures? furthermore why would you want to be making sexual gestures to a room full of strangers? **